Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Currently, our truck has a Rockwell rear-end with a 2.93 gearing. At 68 mph, the engine RPM's are at 1700, which is near the upper rpm limit, and is just out of the best fuel mileage range. So, would it be possible for the math guru's to calculate what RPM I would have by swapping to a 2.64 gear ratio. Bonus is that this particular rear end is also a locker and locally available. Haven't seen it and the cover hasn't been pulled to check for damage. Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porky69 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 It calculates out to 1531rpm. 2.64/2.93x1700=1531.74rpm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hewhoknowslittle Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Jim keep me posted on this if you do it, as I am thinking the same thing. Roger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 That would be better, but I was hoping to get under 1500rpm. 1450 is the sweet spot on the M-11"s. Since I never use the bottom 3 gears, and skip shift / float I'd still drive it like a 5 speed just start with a lower gear. There is a junkyard near that has a 2009 model out of a front end wreck. $600 and new mounting hardware, fresh oil, and probably have it re-setup "lash". I can do the ford 9" and old gm 10 and 12 bolts, but I think I would need a forklift for this. Might need to find a 2.5? Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shallow Draft Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 my door sticker says 3.42 gearing. @ 68 mph I am turning right around 1500 rpm. give or take the thickness of the gauge needle. 2004 Volvo 630, Freedomline, Rear view camera, Max Brake, Jackalopee, 38 ft 4 horse LQ Platinum, 40ft Jayco Talon toy hauler Http:/www.flickr.com/photos/shallow_draft/ Https://flic.kr/p/fqhyAN You are not lost if you don't care where you are!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Shallow- How many gears does that Freedomline have? If you have 13, then you can run a higher gearing on the rear. Gives more torque at the low end- 1st and 2nd, but still allows you to have a lower cruising RPM. Both HeWhoKnowsLittle and I have plain old Rockwell 10sps. No high overdrive like the super 10 etc. Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shallow Draft Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 12 speed seems to be about right. Starts in 3rd and seldom shifts down on the highway except on long steep hills. It stays in 11th until 55mph. I can shift it manually for any situation that warrants more power. 1700 rpm would have me somewhere around 85 to 90 mph if I remember. I will check next time I go for drive. 2004 Volvo 630, Freedomline, Rear view camera, Max Brake, Jackalopee, 38 ft 4 horse LQ Platinum, 40ft Jayco Talon toy hauler Http:/www.flickr.com/photos/shallow_draft/ Https://flic.kr/p/fqhyAN You are not lost if you don't care where you are!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennWest Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 You got me curious about this. According to my research 1450 rpm is DD 60 14L also. Will be towing next monday, not morrow. Will know more then. 2003 Teton Grand Freedom towed with 2006 Freightliner Century 120 across the beautiful USA welding pipe.https://photos.app.goo.gl/O32ZjgzSzgK7LAyt1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil D Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Jim, according to the Meritor web site, the correct ratio at the step you're considering is 2.67, not 2.64. It doesn't make that big of a difference (1549 RPM @ 68 MPH instead of Porky's calculated 1532 RPM, which I verified on an old spreadsheet built for this purpose), but it is slightly different. That said, that may well still be the right ratio, because you might regret trying to go to an even taller gear. The next step higher is, as you said, 2.50, and in your truck that would result in an engine speed drop all the way down to 1451 RPM @ 68 MPH -- right on top of your torque peak, instead of having a 98 RPM cushion -- which could have you downshifting on grades that you now take for granted. A three step move like that may well result in your truck feeling lazier than you'd like, especially with a small-bore engine like the M11. If you know someone at a Cummins distributor, you might ask them what gear ratios Cummins would have recommended/approved with your M11 in combination with the weight you're towing. Phil 2002 Teton Royal Aspen 2003 Kenworth T2000 - Cat C12 380/430 1450/1650, FreedomLine, 3.36 - TOTO . . . he's not in Kansas anymore. ET Air Hitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noteven Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 In my experience with Cummins ISM/ISX engines they seem not to care that much fuel mileage wise about a few hundred rpm when operating at light part throttle loads. "Are we there yet?" asked no motorcycle rider, ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIBERNUT Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 www.roadranger.com for a calculator. NOTE- I swapped my 3.73 (Autoshift) for 3.08's. Went a little too far, 3.23 would have been better W/ my OD ratio & tire size. (But now I top out at 97...............). If you're considering a gear change, not that hard to do but HEAVY. If'n I was to do it again, I'd swap a salvage yard for a factory single of the right ratio, heavier rear & brakes than a tandem singled 2000 Volvo 635 A/S, N-14 Cummins"The Phoenix"'03 KA 38KSWB http://s918.photobucket.com/user/sibernut/library/?sort=6&page=1Furkids- Sibe's CH. Sedona & Tseika Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Thank's Phil and Ron. I've thought about finding a factory single to swap in. I just started thinking about this on the way back from the ECR and mentioned this to a fellow camper here in the park. This guy is running dump trucks for a company that is raising the leeve's and needed some scrap steel to rebuild a push bar for one of the trucks, he found the yard that has this rear end in it. Doing a quick search last night resulted with 100's of rear ends that could be swapped. Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peety3 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 [Engine RPM] / [transmission ratio in desired gear] = driveshaft RPM [Engine RPM] / [transmission ratio in desired gear] / [axle ratio] = axle shaft RPM [Engine RPM] / [transmission ratio in desired gear] / [axle ratio] / [tire revolutions per mile] * 60 (minutes per hour) = road speed in MPH Example: 1500 / 0.86 (overdrive top gear) / 2.64 / 502 (randomly picked Michelin X Line Energy 1 in 11R22.5) * 60 = 78mph 1300 / 0.86 / 2.64 / 502 * 60 = 68mph Note that regearing your rear axle to get a lower cruise RPM could potentially "force" you to add a shift and rethink which gears you use. Many engines wanted 1500 RPM for a long time, then Cat went to 1350, and now Volvo is walking it down to 1050. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 I don't know my transmission ratios, but having to rethink what gears to use is simple. I shift around 1500-1700 most of the time anyway. Having to use a gear lower than 4th to get moving isn't an issue. Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil D Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 FYI, in case anybody is wondering, the formula I don't know my transmission ratios . . . I don't know your transmission ratios either, Jim, but I know by your axle ratio that you have a direct drive transmission. While some of the very late model trucks with the newer, ultra low RPM/high fuel economy engines have axle ratios of less than 3.00:1 combined with an overdrive transmission, that idea would have been absurd back when trucks like yours and mine were new. Since Peety offered three other useful formulas, the formula for calculating the answer to the question that you originally asked (Engine RPM at a given speed), and upon which both my spreadsheet and the calculator at roadranger.com is based, is as follows: Speed in MPH X Transmission Ratio X Drive Axle Ratio X Tire Revs per Mile / 60 = Engine RPM @ whatever value you used for "Speed in MPH" Phil 2002 Teton Royal Aspen 2003 Kenworth T2000 - Cat C12 380/430 1450/1650, FreedomLine, 3.36 - TOTO . . . he's not in Kansas anymore. ET Air Hitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Dreamer Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Don't forget to change your speedometer to match any changes in rear end ratios. Dave 2005 Freightliner Century S/T, Singled, Air ride ET Jr. hitch 2019 46'+ Dune Sport Man Cave custom 5th wheel toy hauler Owner of the 1978 Custom Van "Star Dreamer" which might be seen at a local car show near you! Check out http://www.hhrvresource.com/ for much more info on HDT's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Don't forget to change your speedometer to match any changes in rear end ratios. Dave It's already off by 5% or so..... Drive by the GPS speedo Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil D Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Don't forget to change your speedometer to match any changes in rear end ratios. Dave That, strangely, is an engine function, not a truck function. Changes that affect speedometer/odometer functions are controlled by the engine's control module, which then interfaces with the truck's speedometer. It's one of the things to consider before having your ECM scanned and parameters changed. Phil 2002 Teton Royal Aspen 2003 Kenworth T2000 - Cat C12 380/430 1450/1650, FreedomLine, 3.36 - TOTO . . . he's not in Kansas anymore. ET Air Hitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCooter Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Is the little Cummins powerband that much higher than the C12? I like mine to run at 1350-1450 while on the flats for best fuel economy. What is your top trans ratio Phil? I have 3.36's in mine with a .73 top OD netting a final of 2.45 rolling on a 42" tire and would like one more OD when traveling on the flats out of CA when speeds are 70+MPH. I used to leave in 4th unloaded and 3rd loaded, but now one gear lower since swapping out the 3.90's. What I found as the written sweet spot really doesn't apply to me only running below 40K gross combined. I would do 3.08's or 3.21's if I had it to do over again. Jim's situation I guess would be different without OD gears to work with as I don't think I'd want to be driving miles in an under direct gear. Get too tall and the back country roads could end up driving in 8th or 9th. 1999 Peterbilt 385 C12 430/1650 13spd 2006 Dodge 3500 DRW 4x4 2010 Hitchhiker Champagne 36 LKRSB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hone eagle Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Jim does your gen 1 have the 'green band ' on the tach? I run mine at the very end of mine (high) and I got 8.4 on the way to the ECR and 9.2 back,same RPM same route 3.73 gear. Loading(wind) made more of a difference then revs,we had way more breeze and much colder on the way there. 2005 volvo 670 freedomline singledNewmar Torrey Pine 34rskswoot woot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgiaHybrid Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Is the little Cummins powerband that much higher than the C12? I like mine to run at 1350-1450 while on the flats for best fuel economy. What is your top trans ratio Phil? I have 3.36's in mine with a .73 top OD netting a final of 2.45 rolling on a 42" tire and would like one more OD when traveling on the flats out of CA when speeds are 70+MPH. I used to leave in 4th unloaded and 3rd loaded, but now one gear lower since swapping out the 3.90's. What I found as the written sweet spot really doesn't apply to me only running below 40K gross combined. I would do 3.08's or 3.21's if I had it to do over again. Jim's situation I guess would be different without OD gears to work with as I don't think I'd want to be driving miles in an under direct gear. Get too tall and the back country roads could end up driving in 8th or 9th. Our new truck will be running a 3.07 rear and .73 OD just like yours. At 1300 rpm, it should run 68 mph on the nose. On long stretches, 1400 rpm should yield 73 mph which is supposed to be the sweet spot for economy but will be a little faster than I plan on running (just in case a certain enforcement officer with a penchant for Dr Pepper is reading this). 2023 Thor Magnitude XG32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alie&Jim's Carrilite Posted April 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 No Ralf, no green band on the tach... Company is moving me as of Friday so I won't get this particular rear end, but now my curiosity is going. If we stay somewhere long enough to do a swap I'll do it. Jim's Adventures Old Spacecraft.... Who knows whats next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peety3 Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Is the little Cummins powerband that much higher than the C12? I like mine to run at 1350-1450 while on the flats for best fuel economy. What is your top trans ratio Phil? I have 3.36's in mine with a .73 top OD netting a final of 2.45 rolling on a 42" tire and would like one more OD when traveling on the flats out of CA when speeds are 70+MPH. I used to leave in 4th unloaded and 3rd loaded, but now one gear lower since swapping out the 3.90's. What I found as the written sweet spot really doesn't apply to me only running below 40K gross combined. I would do 3.08's or 3.21's if I had it to do over again. Jim's situation I guess would be different without OD gears to work with as I don't think I'd want to be driving miles in an under direct gear. Get too tall and the back country roads could end up driving in 8th or 9th. 0.73 is a rather tall OD gear...I don't think you want anything taller. It's all relative - you could change the rear axle ratio and get the same target road speeds, and I'd question the sanity of asking the transmission to make the driveshaft spin any faster if the rear axle is just going to make the axle shafts turn the same speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCooter Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 0.73 is a rather tall OD gear...I don't think you want anything taller. It's all relative - you could change the rear axle ratio and get the same target road speeds, and I'd question the sanity of asking the transmission to make the driveshaft spin any faster if the rear axle is just going to make the axle shafts turn the same speeds. With the 13spd, we get two OD ratios. So with a 3.08 I could run 50-60 mph in 7th over(direct) which would be perfect of our lower CA speed limits, 8th under (.86) for 60-70mph out of state, and 8th over (.73) for unloaded times where speeds are higher. This way I could actually use the lower gears available with this transmission too.....I never use low or 1st ever. This should theoretically lower both trans and differential temps with less RPM's turned. The only downside I can see is a taller overall reverse gear. 1999 Peterbilt 385 C12 430/1650 13spd 2006 Dodge 3500 DRW 4x4 2010 Hitchhiker Champagne 36 LKRSB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoDirectionHome Posted April 26, 2016 Report Share Posted April 26, 2016 Hope this helps the mathematically challenged. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7CbziwK0mUmOTMtcFJxc05PbU1hZWVFVnE0dmpLZVliZVVr/view "There are No Experts, Do the Math!" 2014 Freightliner Cascadia DD16 600hp 1850ft-lb 18spd 3.31 260"wb SpaceCraft S-470 SKP #131740 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.