Campgrounds overcrowded?

[agesilaus]

Maybe but is that article wrong, or did you just refuse to look and see. That's why I included the second link in case NASA was not authoritative enough for you.  Everything on WUWT is extensively documented with links to other sources, you know that would be science style not emotional style. If you bothered to read it you would also see that the commenters are heavily loaded with professional researchers and engineers. The site has also been ranked number on on the web for science based webpages.

[hemsteadc]

1 hour ago, agesilaus said:

. So maybe lack of mass media exposure explains why I never heard of this leftist group.

Out in left field would be a more appropriate description.  Out of their minds to be more specific.

Edited September 22, 2020 by hemsteadc

[Zulu]

55 minutes ago, agesilaus said:

Maybe but is that article wrong . . .

Nope.

 

55 minutes ago, agesilaus said:

That's why I included the second link in case NASA was not authoritative enough for you.  Everything on WUWT is extensively documented with links to other sources, you know that would be science style not emotional style. If you bothered to read it you would also see that the commenters are heavily loaded with professional researchers and engineers. The site has also been ranked number on on the web for science based webpages.

If you're really interested in the facts, then personal blogs, no matter how "professional" looking are not a good source. You should go to the primary or original source(s). In this case, it's a 2017 AAAS Science research article.

On the other hand, making sweeping generalizations like the following . . .

8 hours ago, agesilaus said:

Of course out there you seem to have a lot of people setting fires intentionally which does not help matters. And forest mismanagement make it worse.

. . . without any evidence doesn't help make your case, especially "fire mismanagement" as it's currently just a political talking point.

Edited September 22, 2020 by Zulu

[hemsteadc]

2 hours ago, sandsys said:

n. Maybe your source has a reason to give them more coverage?

When conspiracy theorists get on the ballot for a senate seat, yeah, I'd like to know. My sources care if I know what's' going on.

Edited September 22, 2020 by hemsteadc

[noteven]

I have a question about reversing climate change. Would we consider 1/2 a kilometer or the full kilometer of ice on top of Chicago to be “normal”?

[hemsteadc]

Perhaps it's time to close this thread.  

[Pappy Yokum]

10 hours ago, agesilaus said:

Of course out there you seem to have a lot of people setting fires intentionally which does not help matters.

And forest mismanagement make it worse.

There have always been arsonists - of all types of property,  public and private, urban and rural.  Fortunately, they are few and far between (and usually caught).

Would you please list the recent wild land fires in California that were set by the "lot of people setting fires intentionally" (arsonists). The Gender Reveal Party which caused the El Dorado fire (San Bernardino) was not arson - just stupidity.

Forest Management:  As POTUS stated, we (or someone) should get out and "rake the leaves". Pure genius!

Then towns like "Pleasure"  (what he called Paradise, CA when he visited) would not have been destroyed by a fire which began on Federal land by PG&E transmission lines..... which might be considered a "shocking" revelation for you!

 

Edited September 23, 2020 by Pappy Yokum