Kids making me feel guilty.
#1
Posted 11 April 2012 - 09:44 PM
#2
Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:09 PM
Put the transmission into economy mode unless you need power to pass or merge. If you let the transmission auto-shift on hills take it out of economy then too. The economy mode will also reduce the tendency to hunt between fifth and sixth at low RPMs and on cruise making life easier on the transmission.
Me, I's stuff the kid in the basement with a video game and cruise at my torque peak in 6th. :-)
#3
Posted 12 April 2012 - 04:55 AM
"The Phoenix"
'03 KA 38KSWB
Furkids- Sibe's CH. Nooka & CH. Sedona
#4
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:00 AM
Me, I's stuff the kid in the basement with a video game and cruise at my torque peak in 6th. :-)
LOL! Now that's funny.
Geo
2008 Volvo 780, 535hp 1850lb/ft D-16 I-Shift, 3.42
2005 Mobile Suites 38RL3
2009 Hyundai Genesis 4.6
2011 Hyundai Elantra Touring
Fishing junk out of oil wells. One piece at a time.
Know safety and no pain. No safety and know pain.
Texting while driving = Death by LOL.
#5
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:48 AM
If an 8 year old is thinking that way, God help us all.They're just upset that you are enjoying what you worked for and won't be in your estate.
#6
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:09 AM
Are you really serious, or just posing a question?. What steps could I do to save on gas (diesel) as much as possible. My 8 year old was upset when she noticed I was driving 65MPH.
In most large RVs, once you find the most fuel efficient speed at which to travel, any increase of 5 mph will cut your mpg by 10% so the cost would be 10% more than you are currently paying, whatever that might be. This is the first time that I have ever heard of 10 - 15¢. I doubt that it would be 10¢/mile, but ..............................
Author & Escapee's Magazine contributor
Full-time 11 years...... Now seasonal travelers again.
Kirk & Pam's Great RV Adventure

8 yr, submarine service, 9 cold war missile patrols
#7
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:39 AM
- Cherie
Full-time gen-X technomads (technology enabled nomads) since 2006
Our free full-timing how-to series: No Excuses: Go Nomadic
RV: Zephyr: 1961 GM 4106 bus conversion / Toad: Pixel: 2009 MINI Cooper
#8
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:46 AM
Tell the kid that is somewhat true for cars, but it also depends a great deal on how the vehicle is geared. I've had cars that are running flat out at 55, and others that were hardly going yet at 60. I really get irritated at all the global warming propaganda I see in many of the popular kids movies ...they are being indoctrinated, and too much of it is pure baloney.
'03 Winnebago Ultimate Advantage 40E
'05 Honda Odyssey
Escapees, FMCA, WIT, SMART
http://www.pjrider.com
#9
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:57 AM
#10
Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:59 AM
#11
Posted 12 April 2012 - 10:03 AM
Barb
Full-timimg with our cat Shadow (15 yrs old)
2002 Alpine 36 MDDS (Figment II), 2004 Subaru Forester toad (Mischief)
Blog: http://www.barbanddave.net
SPK# 90761 FMCA #F337834
#12
Posted 12 April 2012 - 10:30 AM
Marco&Scape, a 2009 17Ft 3000Lb fully self contained CNW TT and a Ford Escape TV
Growing older is so much more Fun than the only Alternative
#13
Posted 12 April 2012 - 10:54 AM
And as for the CA speed limits (and we have abided by their laws) -- from Mojave to where we are currently staying in Santa Rosa -- 55mph appears (from the truckers & such) to be just a suggestion.
PS Barb -- I'm printing your winery list out & we hope to add a few more to it while exploring everything we can while we're here for the week.
Depending upon which state you are in, there may be a reason the RVs are doing 55, because it is mandated by law as in California - anyone pulling a trailer/vehicle is suppose to be at 55 mph. We always observe the limit for trucks, just makes sense to us. Otherwise, we cruise at about 62 - that seems to be her sweet spot.
Barb
Edited by Kellie Roberts, 12 April 2012 - 10:55 AM.
'94 Bluebird Wanderlodge ~ No Reservations
'08 Jeep Sahara 4x4
SKP #106686
~A ton of regret never made an ounce of difference~
Not A Moment Too Soon
#14
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:15 AM
It does appear that it is very happy chugging along bet. 60-65MPH. It's just that I have followed a few RV who remains at around 55MPH regardless that the posted speed is 70. Is it because they are driving a gasser?
A lot depends on the gearing, with a heavy trailer and light truck you need low gears to pull the thing, same sort of thing for motorhomes. That means your engine spins pretty fast at cruise speed and the difference in 55 and 65 can make a big noise and fuel use difference. That applies to both gas and diesel powered rigs.
Other folks just like driving at slower speeds, maybe they feel safer, like the scenery going by slower or want to save as much fuel as they can.
I'd swear I've met a few folks that were just trying to see just how many cars they can stack up behind their rig, might be part of an underground contest of grumpy old folks sharing Polaroid snaps of the lineups via snail-mail. :-)
#15
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:10 PM
However when I am on a 2 lane and i see cars behind, I pull over at the first chance and let them pass.
#16
Posted 12 April 2012 - 01:21 PM
Stan, or others with a technical bent.... Can you confirm or deny that the most fuel efficient speed is actually quite low?
#17
Posted 12 April 2012 - 03:19 PM
Wind resistance goes up quickly as your speed increases, https://en.wikipedia.../Drag_(physics)
Assuming a more-or-less constant drag coefficient, drag will vary as the square of velocity. Thus, the resultant power needed to overcome this drag will vary as the cube of velocity.
Note that the power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. A car cruising on a highway at 50 mph (80 km/h) may require only 10 horsepower (7.5 kW) to overcome air drag, but that same car at 100 mph (160 km/h) requires 80 hp (60 kW).
Rolling resistance changes are mostly from the additional torque needed to increase the speed: https://en.wikipedia...es_.28torque.29
For pneumatic tires, the direction of change in Crr (#Rolling resistance coefficient) depends on whether or not tire inflation is increased with increasing load. [43]. It's reported that if inflation pressure is increased with load according to an (undefined) "schedule", then a 20% increase in load decreases Crr by 3%. But if the inflation pressure is not changed, then a 20% increase in load results in a 4% increase in Crr.
Engine efficiency... What a can of worms, my cat has left more comprehensible messes under my recliner!

http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-165455.html
And some interesting observations and suggestions that should keep you busy for hours.
http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Improve_MPG_The_Factors_Affecting_Fuel_Efficiency
Buy the book http://www.amazon.co...e/dp/1560911999 or Google for a PDF copy of it.
Better yet buy the book and a good graphing calculator, hand both to the pesky kid and tell them they are grounded until they present hard numbers for all reasonable speeds. Kid might turn into an engineer and be able to support you in your old age. :-)
#18
Posted 12 April 2012 - 04:22 PM
#19
Posted 12 April 2012 - 05:00 PM
The numbers that I quoted to you were for one of those humble gassers! We lived in one for almost 12 years and seem to have managed to be just as happy as those who spend more!It does appear that it is very happy chugging along bet. 60-65MPH. It's just that I have followed a few RV who remains at around 55MPH regardless that the posted speed is 70. Is it because they are driving a gasser?
No doubt about it, you can make a pretty major difference in fuel consumption by your habits of acceleration and deceleration as well. But your cruising speed does also. It takes a lot of time and careful study to determine just what cruising speed is most efficient, but it is pretty safe to say that if you accelerate hard and then rush up to each stop light or sign, using lots of brake to get stopped, you will burn much more fuel than you save by traveling slowly.I'm not so sure it's how fast you cruise but how fast you get to that speed.
This also is something to be considered as tickets can quickly run up the costs of travel!Depending upon which state you are in, there may be a reason the RVs are doing 55, because it is mandated by law
While it is true that I never measured my fuel efficiency for a complete tank of fuel at 25-30 mph, I did do so for speeds ranging from 55 mph to 70 mph for at least three tanks in succession, and using mostly interstate highway travel for most tests. I have also done that same thing for US routes at 55, 60, 65, then at 58 and 62. Over the past 14 years I probably did mpg tests at least 100 times with various average speeds and conditions. I feel pretty confident that my coach would not have been more fuel efficient if I had traveled at 25 or even 30 mph. To do so, I would never have traveled in overdrive at all and would have spent a great deal of time running in second gear. Simple math of engine revolutions per mile traveled should make it fairly apparent that the most efficient speed will be at some point fast enough to spend the majority of time in the highest gear available.I wonder if this talk of a sweet spot at around 60 something has more to do with the feel and sound of the vehicle than anything to do with fuel efficiency?
Author & Escapee's Magazine contributor
Full-time 11 years...... Now seasonal travelers again.
Kirk & Pam's Great RV Adventure

8 yr, submarine service, 9 cold war missile patrols
#20
Posted 12 April 2012 - 05:33 PM
SKP 100137. North Ridgeville, Ohio in the summer, sort of and where ever it is warm in the winter.


This topic is locked









